What is AI technical due diligence?
An independent review of an AI product, vendor, or system, covering architecture, model choices, evaluation rigor, data handling, security, scalability, maintainability, team capability, and technical risk.
AI technical due diligence
For businesses about to buy an AI product, and the investors and acquirers weighing one, an independent technical review of how it was tested, where your data goes, what you are locked into, and the gap between the demo and the system underneath.
An independent, technical read on an AI product, vendor, or system, the kind a pitch deck and a polished demo will not give you. The work covers architecture and model choices, how (and whether) the system is actually evaluated, data handling and security, scalability, cost and reliability, team and maintainability, and the specific risks worth weighing before you commit.
You walk away with a written diligence report: what is real, what is fragile, what is missing, and what it would take to fix, in language a buyer, procurement team, investment committee, or acquirer can act on.
It fits a major vendor selection or purchase, a partnership, a funding round, or an acquisition, anywhere an AI capability is central to the decision and someone needs a senior technical opinion that is not selling anything. For internal build-vs-buy and roadmap questions, AI strategy and roadmap is the closer fit; for a single scoped decision, the AI Decision Memo may be enough.
AI diligence includes normal software diligence, but it also has its own failure modes: thin wrappers over third-party models, weak evaluation, unclear training or retrieval data, hidden inference costs, brittle prompts, vendor lock-in, hallucination risk, and demos that do not match production conditions.
The point is not to punish every risk. It is to identify which risks are acceptable, which are fixable, which change the valuation or purchase decision, and which should stop the deal until more evidence exists.
Answers
An independent review of an AI product, vendor, or system, covering architecture, model choices, evaluation rigor, data handling, security, scalability, maintainability, team capability, and technical risk.
Any business buying or committing to an AI product or vendor, including procurement teams and executives, plus investors and acquirers evaluating whether an AI capability is real, reliable, and worth the commitment.
What is real, what is fragile, architecture and model choices, data and security risks, evidence quality, red flags, and what must be fixed or validated next.
AI diligence adds model dependency, data provenance, evaluation quality, hallucination and failure behavior, inference cost, vendor lock-in, governance, and wrapper risk.
Yes. The same diligence lens can be used before a vendor commitment, partnership, acquisition, funding decision, or major internal rollout.
If the question is one scoped build-vs-buy, vendor, or feasibility decision, the AI Decision Memo may be the faster fit.
Next step
Bring the system, claim, or deal that needs an independent technical read before you commit.